Trill WG:
I missed one other editorial change for RFC6439bis-02.txt. RFC7180 has been obsoleted by RFC7780. This needs to be changed. Sue From: trill [mailto:trill-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:18 PM To: trill@ietf.org Cc: 'Donald Eastlake'; draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439...@ietf.org; 'Jon Hudson' Subject: [trill] Shepherd's review Review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-02.txt Status: Ready to publish Concerns: None Editorial nits: Section 2.2.1 - paragraph 6 sentence starting with /should the VLANs - it would help if the sentence was broken into to sentences. Section 4.0 - 4th paragraph - in the 1st numbered sub-paragraph - the sentence starting with /This is backward/ Is "backward compatible" correct English. My understanding is that it would "backwardly compatible" (adverb adjective-noun). This sentence would also benefit from breaking it in 2. Sue Hares
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list trill@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
