Support as co-author of this draft. Also am not aware of any IP related to this draft. Thanks Prasad
From: trill [mailto:trill-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 9:55 AM To: trill@ietf.org Cc: trill-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20) We did not receive any comments on the WGLC for draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07692.html). Perhaps this was because I started the WG LC during Chinese new year. We will try a second WG LC before declaring "no support for this draft" In your comments please consider, 1) Does the support of multi-point BFD aid deployments? 2) Are the suggested additions to RFC7177 bootstrapping sufficient for this technology? 3) Do you feel this technology is ready for standardization? Sue Hares
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list trill@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
