Hi Kathleen, On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00: No Objection > > ... > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Could you please expand the text in the security considerations section as to > why security properties (integrity, authentication, and encryption since they > are not part of RBridge Channel messages except when explicitly added on in > the > extension draft) were not built in? I'm assuming it is the limited scope of > use for the protocol. I am glad that options exist to add it in, but wish the > text were a bit more encouraging so that would actually happen. Vendors need > to be motivated to provide these options for customers who may want to use > them, without that motivation, the features won't be provided.
OK. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ trill mailing list trill@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
