On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:38:25 -0400, Jeremy Portzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Kevin and all, > > I agree with Al that this past month's session was particularly > technical, and I apologize that we didn't have a particularly precise > description of the meeting ahead of time.
Jeremy, I didn't mind technical sessions. Actually, I viewed last months presentation as being a rather idiosyncratic chalk talk memoir of a key RPM developer which delved into technicalities. As such it was interesting, but not all that useful in getting a better grip on how to use RPM, which is what I think most of the large audience was expecting. I would have come either way, but a better description of what to expect would have left me less surprised. On the other hand, having done jobs similar to the fine job that the steering committee is doing, I know that you don't always know just what kind of presentation an invited speaker is going to deliver. -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
