> Any opinions from the group on differences between the two? Whitebox is stable and smooth. CentOS does have a more active community, but the slower pace of WB fits my needs as a model closer to RHEL and less Fedora-like.
In any case, WB performs well. I can tell you from experience that RH rpms run without any problems. > > I've started using CentOS, mainly because I was told that Whitebox was > > maintained by a single individual, and CentOS was actually a group of > > people from all over. Not entirely sure if this is true or not, or if What Mr. Tiemann says may be true, and although I have great respect for him, for my needs, it doesn't matter. Actually, I see a benefit to a smaller community - less time is wasted on community white noise and meta-disucussion. Matt Frye -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
