-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Phillip Rhodes wrote: |>this has also been discussed (again, more than once), and we decided |>aginst it because we did want the trilug mailing list to "splinter". | | Was this a Steering Committe discussion or a main mailing list discussion or | something discussed at a meeting? I ask only because I don't recall the | discussion...
If I may break out my old-man syndrome, the idea of splitting the lists has come up multiple times over the years trilug has been in existence. After careful consideration, we shot it down when I was chair because of the effect it had on other groups - effectively splintering the groups, the discussions, and the effectiveness of the group. In the end, we did try it for a while, and in the mailing lists created for the subcommittees/interests withered and died in favor of the main list. For TriLUG, one list and good etiquette seems to work. And I agree that if it ain't broke, don't fix it! - -- - ---------------------------------- - -- Kevin Sonney -- - -- ICQ: 4855069 AIM: ksonney -- - ---------------------------------- 1024D/320C 0336 3BC4 13EC 4AEC 6AF2 525F CED7 7BB6 12C9 ~ Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX. -- Stephan Zielinski -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFDOf69ce1jAa4B7VERAvlFAJinusij3C5jLj46yU+8gaAuOMzHAJ91kCzV CVRJp33ukkgaR3VYZl8LXg== =531m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
