Product naming is pretty much a black art -- if you can find one that reads "positively" to the marketing types and doesn't infringe on trademarks, you've done pretty well. To try to avoid anything that could be morphed into a negative by a user is damn near impossible.
I'm reminded of a story I heard years ago about a couple who wanted to give their newborn daughter a name that other kids couldn't make fun of. After months of agonizing, they finally settled on "Amber". After she was born, the father loaded up their five-year-old to go see his new little sister. "Say 'Hi' to your little sister, Jimmy..." "Hi, Amburger". I don't think you can avoid creating names that can be mocked. The trick is to create a product that customers don't want/need to mock. Shane O. On 12/7/05, Israel J Pattison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The conversation about TRS-80 and PS/2, I had to point out that the computer > industry seems plagued by brand names that are easily parodied. I wonder > why these companies don't think about the nicknames their products will > acquire once they reach the end user. Here are a few I can think of: > > DB/2, PS/2, OS/2: Half a {computer, database, operating system} > PS/2: Piece of Snot/2 > TRS-80: Trash-80 > Thinkpad: Stinkpad > Intellistation: Repellistation > Aptiva: Craptiva > Logitech: Logiwreck > > Can you think of others? > > -- > Israel J. Pattison > Raleigh, NC > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web: http://www.fanana.net > > "Infinity, dear [friends], extends not only outward, but inward, into each > human heart." -- Dr. E. Urner Goodman > -- > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ > -- Shane O. ======== Shane O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==================== -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/