On 1/4/06, Tanner Lovelace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/4/06, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's been a few weeks since I read the BBV report with the details of > > the hack, so I just re-scanned it. > > > > Actually, the exploit DIDN'T involve or require changes to the > > accubasic interpreter. The full details are available here:
> Um, isn't that exactly what I said? I didn't say it required changes > to the interpreter, I said he preloaded postive and negative votes > on the card. Not to stir things up any more than we have already, but what you said exactly was: > What happened here was that the accubasic INTERPRETER was > programmed with 5 positive and 5 negative votes and so when they ran > the test to make sure there were 0 votes before starting the test, it did, > indeed, say that there were zero votes. Of course I emphasized the word INTERPRETER. Just trying to keep earning those frequent pedant points. <G> -- Rick DeNatale Visit the Project Mercury Wiki Site http://www.mercuryspacecraft.com/ -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
