Mark, The problem is definitely with that server. You can see the +0400 EDT whcih should be -0400 EDT, hence your 8 hours difference. ;)
What is sendmail's timezone set to? (TimeZoneSpec= ) -- Paul @ Thy Service > Paul, > > The date/time is still correct: > Received: from 198.205.32.93 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mark) > by www.adeliesystems.com with HTTP; > Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:08 +0400 (EDT) > > My server is doing something... hmmmmmmmm > > The plot thickens --- > > Mark > > > > On Fri, May 19, 2006 11:19, Paul G. Szabady wrote: >> Mark, >> >> >> In looking at your headers, it seems like the problem is at the >> originating machine, 198.205.32.93. Note the timestamp: >> >> Snippet: >> Received: from 198.205.32.93 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mark) >> by www.adeliesystems.com with HTTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:08 +0400 >> (EDT) >> >> >> >> >> Start FULL headers: >> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Received: from talon.trilug.org (talon.trilug.org [64.244.27.142]) >> by at.thyservice.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4JF8Sf3005312 for >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:28 -0400 >> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) >> by talon.trilug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A1461A1BB2; Fri, 19 May >> 2006 >> 11:08:26 -0400 (EDT) >> Received: from talon.trilug.org ([127.0.0.1]) >> by localhost (talon [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id >> 12817-03-6; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:26 -0400 (EDT) >> Received: from talon.trilug.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) >> by talon.trilug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2A4619F6F8; Fri, 19 May >> 2006 >> 11:08:20 -0400 (EDT) >> X-Original-To: [email protected] >> Delivered-To: [email protected] >> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) >> by talon.trilug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507F8619F6F4 for >> <[email protected]>; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:18 -0400 (EDT) >> Received: from talon.trilug.org ([127.0.0.1]) >> by localhost (talon [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id >> 12817-03-2 for <[email protected]>; >> Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:16 -0400 (EDT) >> Received: from technicalpublishing.com >> (rrcs-24-172-58-60.midsouth.biz.rr.com >> [24.172.58.60]) >> (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) >> (No client certificate requested) >> by talon.trilug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF8D619F6EF for >> <[email protected]>; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:16 -0400 (EDT) >> Received: from www.adeliesystems.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) >> by technicalpublishing.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4JF87Qe020191 >> for >> <[email protected]>; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:08 -0400 >> Received: from 198.205.32.93 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mark) >> by www.adeliesystems.com with HTTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:08 +0400 >> (EDT) >> Message-ID: >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> In-Reply-To: >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> References: >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:08 +0400 (EDT) >> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] email time stamp incorrect >> From: "Mark Fowle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list" <[email protected]> >> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> X-TIPS-Mail-Server-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for >> more information X-TIPS-Mail-Server-MailScanner: Found to be clean >> X-TIPS-Mail-Server-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on >> localhost X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at >> trilug.org X-BeenThere: [email protected] >> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 >> Precedence: list >> Reply-To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <[email protected]> >> List-Id: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <trilug.trilug.org> >> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug>, >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> List-Archive: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug> >> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> >> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> List-Subscribe: <http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug>, >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at trilug.org >> X-Virus-Status: Clean >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on >> at.thyservice.com X-Spam-Level: >> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=2.5 >> tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.64 Status: RO >> X-UID: 132811 >> Content-Length: 2012 >> X-Keywords: >> >> >> >> -- >> Paul >> @ Thy Service >> >> >>> thanks - It's definitely my server that's doing it - I just don't know >>> where to look. The system date and time show correctly, the timezone is >>> right.... Just not sure where else to look (except inside >>> sendmail.cf/sendmail.mc) -- >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 19, 2006 11:05, Barry Gaskins wrote: >>> >>>> I could be wrong but isn't the time stamp on the email set by the >>>> person sending the email? Maybe the person who sent you the email has >>>> the time or timezone set incorrectly on the machine that they sent it >>>> from. I dont think the mail server machine sets the timestamp. I do >>>> notice that your email says that it was sent 8 hours ago (I am looking >>>> at it using the gmail web interface.) >>>> >>>> - Barry Gaskins >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/19/06, Mark Fowle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> When I receive email from my mail server the time stamp is off by >>>>> -8 >>>>> hours. The system date/time is correct and so is the timezone - I >>>>> am using sendmail on a RHEL 4 server. Any idea where else I might >>>>> look? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Mark >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> TriLUG mailing list : >>>>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug >>>>> TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ >>>>> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> TriLUG mailing list : >>>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug >>>> TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ >>>> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >>> >>> -- >>> TriLUG mailing list : >>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug >>> TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ >>> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ >>> >>> >> >> -- >> TriLUG mailing list : >> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug >> TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ >> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >> > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ > -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
