What is your "security=" in the globals?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done a lot of this. Group shares generally work just fine. Heck as
long ago as 8 years ago I had this working for a large company with each
branch having their own shared folder areas. The folks didn't even know
that it was a Linux box running samba that they were attaching to.
Why don't you post your config.
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 9:33 am
Subject: [TriLUG] Samba question
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <[email protected]>
Had anyone tried to set up a Samba share in the following manner:
/data1 (shared to all employees. used as a general place where
everyone can
dump files)
/data1/marketing (where only employees that are defined in the group
marketing (in /etc/groups) can access the share?)
This seems it should be possible. However this was tried in
practice users
defined in the /etc/groups group for marketing will lose
connectivity to the
/data1/marketing share occasionally. Does anyone have a restrictive
directory shared from within a general access shared directory working
properly?
Would it be easier to just define the users instead of using groups
(likethe following example)?
[marketing]
comment = Marketing
path = /data1/marketing
valid users = mary fred
public = no
writable = yes
printable = no
create mask = 0765
Greg
--
TriLUG mailing list :
http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilugTriLUG Organizational
FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
