Well, that blows my idea out of the water. We're using Cisco (SLB) + Windows NLB (varies for services offered). I suppose the real decision for what you're going to use should be based off the size of the organization.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tarus Balog Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:33 AM To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list Subject: Re: [TriLUG] [OT] Content/Load Balancing switches On Jan 8, 2007, at 6:05 PM, Chris Bullock wrote: > We are possibly getting ready to start supporting a vendor that can > use load balancing. What are the preferred vendors and models for > load balancers? My preference is for HP but I have been told that HP > has discontinued their line of load balancing switches. I would > prefer *not* to buy Cisco, just because I dislike their stratagy of > having to purchase upgrades and I also dislike their license model, > but please lets not go off on that tangent. I'm at a client site that is using Radware and seems happy with it, FWIW. -T _______________________________________________________________________ Tarus Balog, OpenNMS Maintainer Main: +1 919 533 0160 The OpenNMS Group, Inc. Fax: +1 503 961 7746 Skype: tarusb Direct: +1 919 647 4749 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.opennms.org PGP Key Fingerprint: 8945 8521 9771 FEC9 5481 512B FECA 11D2 FD82 B45C -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
