On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:05:45AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > I'm about to apply your later series, but I noticed that that one
> > instead of the --fds patch, has the -E change.
> >
> > Do you still plan on submitting the --fds change later?
> > The reason I ask is that it if we're doing --fds, then it might at some
> > point
> > mean we can deprecate (and then remove) use of -P in favor of it, so
> > adding an
> > inverse (-E) seems odd.
>
> Hi Dave! To be fair, not sure at moment. Initially I wanted to implement a
> general
> --fds option which might take more complex command line like
> sockets:PF_X,^PF_X and
> such, then extend it to file:^pipe,epoll. But this end up in being somehow
> more complex rework. So I decided to stick with simplier approach first --
> -E option
> which would exclude some socket protocols from being generated.
>
> But sure, once time permit I can try to implement --fds option as well. Lets
> fisrt
> summarize what kind of syntax it will carry.
>
> --fds [sockets:PF_X,^PF_X,N,^N,all,none],[files:pipe,^epoll,all,none]
>
> Sounds good?
Sure. I just pushed out your 2nd patch set.
thanks,
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
