P.S. Regarding these extensions, what if I am unable to locate their source code? Should I still include them?
On 04/15/2014 07:36 PM, laigualdad wrote: > Hi thanks, not sure what to name this thread now. I'll be sure to avoid > starting a new thread by replying to the list. > > Oh dear god I don't know what happened to that paste. The link seems to > have stopped working (the host may have deleted it!!!), although it was > supposed to have stayed active for 30 days. I should have saved a local > copy... What a pity. Not using hastebin anymore!!! (If anyone saved a > copy, let me know) > > At least I have some sense of which extensions they were. It won't be > hard to add them. Working on it now. > > > On 04/13/2014 08:58 PM, Andrew Lindley wrote: >> From: laigualdad <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Trisquel-devel] abrowser addons >> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:53:22 -0500 >> >>> I scouted out a bunch of freedom friendly addons (judged based on the >>> licenses) we can add to Abrowser. If you give me the permission, I will >>> add them to the list. >>> >>> http://hastebin.com/dupowiwaxu.avrasm >>> >>> Note: Although there is an entry on the abrowser addons index, >>> Firegloves is unfortunately no longer available on the Mozilla addon >>> site (404). >>> >>> >>> On 04/13/2014 01:31 PM, Andrew Lindley wrote: >>>> From: Rubén Rodríguez <[email protected]> >> [Thread jacked stuff removed] >> >> Firstly, well done for doing the research and being willing to do more. >> >> AFAIK the only person who can give permission for anything Trisquel is >> Rubén. However, as on the RH pane of the Trisquel.info site when >> you're logged in there's an entry Create Content with a sub-entry >> Add-On available to all users, then it doesn't look like you need >> permission in the first place. >> >> The English page it links to [1] has a number fields, like a combo box >> of approved licenses, description and several URLs for use in the >> Add-on entry. If you want some QA, then prep your entries in a self >> explanatory text file (unbroken URLs) and post them here with a long >> post warning in the subject. I for one will do some checking as and >> when I'm well enough (I'm disabled). But, best post here rather than >> send directly so others might pick it up if I'm not. >> >> While there's no 'use netiquette' rules posted for trisquel-dev and >> I'm not in a position to make policy please from a practical point of >> view do not in future top post to an extant bottom posted thread. In >> this case it didn't matter, but in an ongoing discussion it will >> rapidly mean no one can follow the flow of conversation in later quoting. >> >> Lastly well done for doing the research and being will to do more again. >> >> Leny >> >> [1] https://trisquel.info/en/node/add/addon >> _______________________________________________ >> Trisquel-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Trisquel-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel > _______________________________________________ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
