Yeah, some of them are misleading... I didn't know that the source is actually in the xpi file. Why should we add a link to the source code, in that case?
I'll review the ones I did and check the xpi files, then edit accordingly. Looks like this will take me some time to go through every one. Probably at least a few weeks, but we'll get there xP On 04/19/2014 11:35 AM, Legimet wrote: > The source is usually in the xpi file. I looked at one extension "Flash Video > Downloader" and the mozilla addons page says MPL 1.1, but when I opened the > xpi, I found a file with the following contents: > > Before getting down to using this plug-in, please, take the time to read the > terms of use stated in the current license agreement. Any use of this program > implies that you have read and accepted these terms to the fullest extent. > > 1) Flash Video Downloader Plug-In is designed for downloading flash-content > (video, games, music, etc.) with the help of the > http://flashvideodownloader.org/ service, which gets opened in a new Firefox > Internet browser window when needed. > > 2) All the information received by http://flashvideodownloader.org/ is used > solely for purposes listed in clause 1. > > 3) http://flashvideodownloader.org/ disclaims any legal responsibility for > further use of the content downloaded with the help of the service. > > This is clearly nonfree as it violates Freedom 0. > > Legimet > > On Thursday, April 17, 2014 05:21:39 PM laigualdad wrote: > > Thanks, will do. > > > On April 17, 2014 4:44:02 PM CDT, Andrew Lindley <[email protected]> > wrote: > Wrt deleting entries, the Trisquel Team page on the wiki, which seems > out of date (the graphics site mentioned no longer exists), says > SirGrant maintains the links. I know from experience he has > additional permissions for the Issue system, so PM him via the web site > with a list of what to delete and why. Perhaps he can still delete > them. > > Leny > > From: laigualdad <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Trisquel-devel] abrowser addons was Re: Packaged > Youtube ALL HTML5 > Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 21:54:53 -0500 > > > Ah, I see. I think there has been some confusion, as most > contributors > to the addons list put the download link in the link-to-source-code > field. Perhaps they read it incorrectly. > > I am unable to delete entries however. > > On > 04/15/2014 09:39 PM, Legimet wrote: > > I would say no, since without source code, 2 of the 4 freedoms are > useless. > > laigualdad <[email protected]> wrote: > > > P.S. Regarding these extensions, what if I am unable to locate > their > source code? Should I still include them? > > On 04/15/2014 07:36 PM, laigualdad wrote: > > Hi thanks, not sure what to name this thread now. I'll be sure > to avoid > starting a new thread by replying to the list. > > Oh dear god I don't know what happened to that paste. The link > seems to > have stopped working (the host > may have deleted it!!!), although > it was > supposed to have stayed active for 30 days. I should have saved > a local > copy... What a pity. Not using hastebin anymore!!! (If anyone > saved a > copy, let me know) > > At least I have some sense of which extensions they were. It > won't be > hard to add them. Working on it now. > > > On 04/13/2014 08:58 PM, Andrew Lindley wrote: > > From: laigualdad <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Trisquel-devel] abrowser addons > Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:53:22 -0500 > > > I scouted out a bunch of freedom friendly addons (judged based > on the > licenses) we can add to Abrowser. If you give me the > permission, I will > add them to the list. > > http://hastebin.com/dupowiwaxu.avrasm > > Note: Although there is an entry on the abrowser addons index, > Firegloves is unfortunately no longer available on the Mozilla > addon > site (404). > > > On 04/13/2014 01:31 PM, Andrew Lindley wrote: > > From: Rubén Rodríguez <[email protected]> > > [Thread jacked stuff removed] > > Firstly, well done for doing the research and being willing to > do more. > > AFAIK the only person who can give permission for anything > Trisquel is > Rubén. However, as on the RH pane of the Trisquel.info site > when > you're logged in there's an entry Create Content with a > sub-entry > Add-On available to > all users, then it doesn't look like you > need > permission in the first place. > > The English page it links to [1] has a number fields, like a > combo box > of approved licenses, description and several URLs for use in > the > Add-on entry. If you want some QA, then prep your entries in a > self > explanatory text file (unbroken URLs) and post them here with a > long > post warning in the subject. I for one will do some checking > as and > when I'm well enough (I'm disabled). But, best post here > rather than > send directly so others might pick it up if I'm not. > > While there's no 'use netiquette' rules posted for trisquel-dev > and > I'm not in a position to make policy please from a practical > point of > view do not in future top post to an extant bottom posted > thread. In > this case it didn't matter, but in an ongoing discussion it will > rapidly mean no one > can follow the flow of conversation in > later quoting. > > Lastly well done for doing the research and being will to do > more again. > > Leny > > [1] https://trisquel.info/en/node/add/addon > > > > Trisquel-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Trisquel-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
_______________________________________________ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
