> Good work. I'll burn this ISO and do some testing. :) In the future, > I hope the project will even do this for alpha.
Well, it was the very first iso image built for this release. > Some questions: > > *Was Inkscape removed only to reduce disk space? If so, I can > understand, as disk space appears to be very limited for this project. Disk space is very important in a live cd, you have 703MB to play with. But it was not the only reason, inkscape is only used by a few users, and in a friendly desktop oriented OS it is not a vital feature. I don't believe in the "its better because includes more programs" stanza. The simpler, the better. And also, it weights 27MB! ;) > *What exactly were the modifications to A Web Browser, and which ones > aren't working? We apply a set of changes to Firefox to make it freedom-respecting, and the modifications require us to change the name and logo. Some of those changes are failing (This part should be discussed in trisquel-devel). > *Today's installation of Conkerer web browser through the updater > came as a surprise. Was this to fix the problem with "About Trisquel" > not starting up if the default browser is removed? I don't know about this. Which unexpected packages came with your updates exactly? > If this was the > main purpose, I think it should be hidden from the Menu Bar by > default. *When you say the icon set is too big, do that mean that the > icon resolutions are too high, or that there are too many icons? It means it wastes too much disk. It should be like half a MB instead of 6MB. Most of the icons are already provided by gnome-icons and can be removed. _______________________________________________ Trisquel-users mailing list [email protected] http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-users
