> I thought I was going to get criticism for the dull and foggy color > scheme and intense white levels of my background... > > Here is a redone version with much richer coloration: > http://i49.tinypic.com/291cpq0.jpg
Well, the colors *are* richer. > "We are going to be a lot more limited with the artwork than we used > to be, as the upstream changes in gdm removed the theme support. We > can just change the gtk/icon theme and the background image. I like > the texture -not that much the colors- in your background image." > > Why would they remove theme support!? They say they did it to make better use of the xsplash boot screen system -that we will not use, at least for this release-. > You can't honestly tell me that a fast, modern computer in 2010 is > going to choke on an image, can you? Is it really now impossible to > include a load bar, or is it simply a matter of changing some source > code around? Well, we can _have_ a bar, but it will not show the progress as the new start scripts coming from Ubuntu (upstart) do not work that way. So it will just pulsate forth and back meaningless. > To restate the question: why have recent updates elected to remove > functionality, breaking lots of beloved hard work of many > contributors on gnome-look.org and elsewhere? Tell me the reason > behind it, so that I may feel like a naive stupid. We are just distributors, we just take the code we are given. In other words, I dunno. But don't worry, you are not the only one pissed with this changes. _______________________________________________ Trisquel-users mailing list [email protected] http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-users
