> Why isn't a more standard markup > used, like MarkDown or one used by a > popular wiki? Both Trisquel and gNewSense use wikis > with simpler > formatting. >
the wiki formatting is similar to bbcode. You can find the list of the allowed wiki tags in the help page together with their meanings > Meaning of some icons wasn't obvious for me, maybe it would > be better to > include also text (all user-editable sites which I know use > text links > for "edit", "add" and similar actions). I think it could be feasible > Is the site's source code available under a free license > (e.g. GNU > AGPL)? It would be consistent with the aim of > supporting free software. I have to decide, I think it will be GPL. I will let you know :). I think I will publish the source code as soon as it will be ready and perfectly checked > The copyright notice on each page is misleading, since > there is no > copyright assignment for text added by users. It's not misleading: the copyrithg is h-node and the text is licensed under FDL (the same as Trisquel do, copyright Trisquel project, text licensed under FDL). In this way you can know who hold the copyright (A user can delete its account: in that case who hold the copyright of the text it hade previously inserted, before the cancellation of the account?) I won't be able to answer during the next few hours, sorry. See you this evening! thanks a lot! Antonio
