I know most of you want everything in GPL, but sometimes Apache has the most flexibility on the direction you want to take your software.
Out of the licences, I'm kinda liking Apache 2.0 the best at the moment. It
is not only compatible with GPL v3, but I can use code in a proprietary
application for mine or other company work without disclosing source code.
Heck, if someone forks me they can use whatever licence they want. I don't
think you can do that with GPL or MPL.
- [Trisquel-users] MPL2 asmegir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 sirgrant
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 nathangnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 nathangnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 Igor . Zobin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 gnufreeme
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 akirashinigami
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] MPL2 gustavo_cm
