Of course, with proprietary software all you buy is actually the license, since the developer remains the owner of the software itself. This way a free license would mean software at no cost. But since it's a stupid concept for trade, imo most people don't think about it like that.
I sometimes refer to free software as to "software under a free license". If
you specify that the license (and not the software) is free, it might help
people to think in the right direction.
- [Trisquel-users] Re : How Open Source is slowly chang... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How Open Source is slowly c... Igor . Zobin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How Open Source is slow... chris
- [Trisquel-users] Re : How Open Source is... rochefort . benjamin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How Open Source is slowly c... levl
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: How Open Source is slo... Igor . Zobin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Antwort: How Open Sourc... Michał Masłowski
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: How Open Sourc... Igor . Zobin