t3g, In your situation if you license the code that runs on the server (e.g.
JavaScript code) to the client under a permissive free license (i.e. one that
allows the client to release it under a non-free license) you are still
providing the client with all the software freedoms. If the client wishes
that people visiting his site use the JavaScript code you developed under a
non-free license, then visitors that value their freedom should reject it and
demand that the client re-license the JavaScript code as free software. Note
that Android faces a similar issue (Google releases it under a free license
that allows device manufacturers to release it without distributing the
source code, and most device manufacturers which produce Android devices do
not provide the Android source code running on the devices).
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Stallman on the Linux Action Sh... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Stallman on the Linux Actio... joseph . e . dickson
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Stallman on the Linux Actio... tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: Stallman on the Li... Igor . Zobin
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Stallman on the Linux A... alonivtsan
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Stallman on the Lin... tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Stallman on the Linux ... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : Stallman on the Linux ... Rick C. Hodgin