Re: [Trisquel-users] Package dependency weirdness

[mikko . viinamaki]

Yeah, thanks for the reply. I think I'll wait a few days in case somebody has  
some more insight and then go ahead and file a bug. Just to make the bug  
report as concise and to-the-point as possible.

I think it should just work as it is now but obviously it doesn't. Perhaps  
this has something to do with (virtual) package versions? Or do virtual  
packages even have versions? Or maybe the dependency is the package instead  
of the virtual package? I'm not familiar enough with the packaging scheme to  
make heads or tails of this. It's a bug all right but I can't put my finger  
on it. Then again, knowing the solution is of course not required for filing  
a bug! :)