В 22:38 +0200 на 17.10.2012 (ср), aliasb...@gmail.com написа: > could be not as stable or worse, with a big security whole, but in > general that could be solved quickly... no ?
Speaking for Debian, yes. For Ubuntu I don't know, because I've never dealt with it. Trisquel as Ubuntu derivative is probably following its life cycle for security. I think I've read once that the security section in Trisquel is updated more often, but I can't link to the source and don't know did I really read that. I suspect it is. Anyone can point to or state the Trisquel policy about security repositories? The other thing is, if one updates Trisquel on every release, the chances are lower to have such issue fixed or not have it at all.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
