> So compiling a modified version is trivial without branding. Indeed, but to quote Brett:
"Unfortunately, such a restriction in a trademark license does make the software nonfree. As we've said in the past, a requirement that you rename the software when you modify it is fine -- but a requirement that you rename it before you distribute it commercially goes too far." So what you have is a situation where people can't make full use of freedom #2 to redistribute *exact copies of the original*, either gratis or for charging a fee, to anyone anywhere.
