It seems like the original question was about why CC-BY-SA hasn't been
adopted for manuals. If you're just licensing an image or other work it would
seem more appropriate to license it with a free CC license. For manuals, I
think the FDL is well-suited.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL Roeplay
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL matt . ivie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL Roeplay
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL matt . ivie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL Andrew Roffey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Thoughts on the GFDL Andrew Roffey