If you care so much about following rules, why do you refuse to follow the
rules of this community?
https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/trisquel-community-guidelines
>The Trisquel project is part of the Free Software Movement and supports the
movement's philosophy. We are happy to collaborate on practical activities
with the supporters of open source, but that is not what we call what we do.
*We ask those editing the Trisquel community wiki, posting to the forum, and
using the mailing list to please avoid certain misnomers and propaganda terms
and to keep in mind the spirit of free software and the GNU/Linux system.*
Emphasis mine. Another good analogy to use is a car or a house. Imagine if
you buy a house, but the blueprints are secret. The only way you can change
your basement is if you go to the first architect and ask him for them. He
can charge whatever he wants, even though it is your house. If it was legal
for car companies to force you to get your car serviced by them exclusively
they would do it. That's what propietary software creates, a monopoly and
dependence.
As to what you say about Stallman not sharing UNIX that's not a good analogy
either. Even if it is possible to decompile and reverse engineer software it
is difficult work and one never gets the original source code back. Someone
correct me if I'm wrong, but Stallman's conflict with proprietary software
started in part because of a bug in a printer driver. He wanted to fix it,
but was unable to do so as the driver was proprietary. In this instance his
alternative was to create a new system. When it comes to movies, music,
electronic books, audiobooks, etc. the content is already accessible but
behind a jail.
And just out of curiosity did you even check out any of the films I linked
you to?
