Could we be a little bit serious please?
So we have GNUser that pretends that "Trisquel has been compromised" because
of a weird behavior when he browses the Web (I would bet on a misbehaving
add-on or conjunction of add-ons) and t3g that claims, from those vague
symptoms, that this is due to a vulnerability of Firefox 22 that was
corrected in Firefox 23... but with no reference whatsoever.
- [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPROMISE... ja-key
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPROMISE... dalewrobson
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPROMISE... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPROMISE... dadix
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPROMISE... tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Re : TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPR... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN CO... gnuser
- [Trisquel-users] Re : TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BE... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAV... gnuser
- [Trisquel-users] Re : TRISQUEL MIGH... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL M... gnuser
- [Trisquel-users] Re : TRISQUEL ... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL M... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPRO... gnuser
- [Trisquel-users] Re : TRISQUEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMPROMIS... mtlben