We don't live in "Oceania", *yet*... But, as I recently said elsewhere
(https://trisquel.info/en/forum/ubuntu-1310-second-step-spy-its-users#comment-41977),
that's the kind of regime that is planned for us.
"The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled
society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by
traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous
surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files
containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files
will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities."
--- Zbigniew Brzezinski, in "Between Two Ages: America's Role in the
Technetronic Era"
(Notice the term *gradual*... Germany also didn't turn into a Police State
and Dictatorship over night...)
As for censorship...
- The UK has already started censoring the web
(http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/olly-lennard/why-david-camerons-intern_b_3653566.html).
- And, so has Australia
(http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-05/17/australia-internet-block),
for example.
- And it will, surely, be a matter of time before other Western governments
start doing the same
(https://trisquel.info/en/forum/internet-censorship-authoritarian-countries#comment-30744).
And, as for the proofs of fake movements and organizations...
(Besides looking for well-known signatures...)
You can spot a lot of them through their funding and by knowing which other
organizations are giving them help (and by knowing who's at the source of
such money, and who runs this last organizations that help the first ones).
(The well-know phrase, among investigators, that is said, when researching
these kind of links, is: "Follow the money"...)
For "civil liberties" organizations, of the type mentioned in the articles
posted on this thread, for example, (that make the "controlled criticism"
that less hurts the establishment) all that you have to do is to check out
their "annual reports", on their web pages, and learn about the foundations
that fund them (who runs them, where they get their money from, who's "in
bed" with the people that have founded them - or, in other words, with whom
they associate, and have common business, with - etc.)
People who are well-known for their misdeeds are not altruistic persons. And,
if they fund organizations other than their own, it's because it somehow
benefits them. (And, if you're well-informed about what they're up to -
http://www.amazon.com/The-True-Story-Bilderberg-Group/dp/1611203155 - you'll
know what specific benefits, and ultimate goals, are those...)
