>making it "open source" is just mentioned as one possible "solution" to the
"problem" of Winamp being dead (and not even the preferred "solution", at
that).
Yes. But , I don't think AOL is going to support Winamp anymore, because this
is unprofitable.
>Those with interest in Mediaplayers can simply study the VLC sources.
There is huge difference between SOME mediaplayer and a famous one. Somebody
can think "Winamp(or other famous software) is just fantastic! I would like
to know how it works! I don't care about VLC/mplayer/etc, I want to see code
of Winamp only!! "
>Just use VLC.
No, thanks. I didn't like Winamp even in my Windowshood.
