They really like Ubuntu there, apparently. They don't have enough good things to say about it (it looks nice, it looks really nice, did we mention it looks nice, etc). Trisquel is mentioned at the very bottom of the page, as usual with the constant "worse hardware support" reminder. They even have a section in their faq which defends the inclusion of proprietary components as needed "to improve hardware capability" http://www.getgnulinux.org/en/linux/linux_faq/#full_freedom

They recommend Trisquel if you're "committed to freedom in your computing", but they don't really explain why you should be "committed to freedom" so it comes off as looking like a crippled, plainer-looking version of Ubuntu.

Reply via email to