Yes, systemd is fast but that's primarily just a side-effect of doing things right.

No it's not. It's because systemd does things differently to the old way of booting. It might be a better way, but it's not "right" versus sysvinit which was "wrong". This is 5 year old runaway ego type stuff. This is why I'm alarmed - he speaks as though prior to his intervention Linux was a backward, broken, fading project, in need of rescuing - nothing could be further from the truth.

Reply via email to