No it's not. It's because systemd does things differently to the old way of booting. It might be a better way, but it's not "right" versus sysvinit which was "wrong". This is 5 year old runaway ego type stuff. This is why I'm alarmed - he speaks as though prior to his intervention Linux was a backward, broken, fading project, in need of rescuing - nothing could be further from the truth.
Yes, systemd is fast but that's primarily just a side-effect of doing things
right.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope some tec... a1716479
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope some tec... a1716479
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope some tec... a1716479
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope some tec... nux
- [Trisquel-users] Re : SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope so... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope... nux
- [Trisquel-users] Re : SystemD (I like old sysv, I... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv... nux
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I ... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope som... a1716479
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope some tec... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] SystemD (I like old sysv, I hope some tec... davesamcdxv