First of all, we don't talk about neither freedom nor privacy here. The question we're discussing at the moment is:
Should we refuse to coorperate with somebody who keeps knowledge for herself?

Next, i want to stress that we'll never be sure what software actually runs on mozilla's servers. So what you basically demand is: in order to consider mozilla's hello to be acceptable, you want that they release a piece of software which (from our limited point of view) does the same job like mozilla's service.
Their server will still remain a secret - forever.
So what did we gain? We gained technical knowledge.
I won't make it a precondition for server owners to contribute knowledge to society in order to cooperate with them. Otherwise I'd run into a practically unusuable internet: forget ebay, forget many onlineshops, forget this forum (afaik). Things become even more absurd this way: i had to ask every server owner "how does your server process my data? You don't use any technology you keep for yourself, do you?". Like: should I refuse to buy at an onlineshop which uses costum software unless they release some code which appears to be what they run on their servers.

That's my strongest argument, and you dodge it over and over again: Your point of view implies absurd consequences.

Reply via email to