He's also naive when it comes to JavaScript, I think; you can't depend on an automated program to tell you if a program is malicious, so if you're just accepting every libre program based on the inspection of such an automated program, you're not protected from any malicious features. RMS doesn't seem to see it that way. He seems to view LibreJS as protective against malicious JavaScript.
I actually messaged RMS about this, and he seems to think that IceCat's way
is better. I think he has been misinformed.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is IceCat that secure that I don't nee... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is IceCat that secure that I don'... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is IceCat that secure that I don'... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is IceCat that secure that I ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is IceCat that secure that I don't nee... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is IceCat that secure that I don't nee... maestro
