No technical argument whatsoever. Same blablabla with long sentences. Summing
up, it tells:
systemd is imposed as a religion by Poettering who knows better than you. It
solves problems *I* do not encounter. It has an agenda of destroying
GNU/Linux by turning it into Windows/Mac (and so have Gnome, freedesktop.org
and the Linux Foundation). It does too much. It is complex. It is against the
UNIX philosophy.
I sincerely believe it is a good summary. Well, minus the many occurrences of
"fucking" and lighter on the conspiracy theory (the actual article ends with
"systemd will *be* Linux. Sit idly by and ignore this fact at
all of our collective peril.").
