Wrong, again, man is born evil, he learns to be good. What is your
definition of good? Thats what needs to be explained, and thats what gets
learned.
The most simple definition, is something that doesn't hurt others is good.
If it hurts others its bad.
But when it comes to why invasion of prprietary software can be unethical
here are some examples:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/proprietary.html
Some examples of why invasion of privacy can be hurtful to others:
"For example, The same way the stasi in nazi germany used seemingly innocent
information to blackmail people into doing things that would hurt others in
their communities. Because things we do in private should sometimes stay
private because it could lead to endangering others physical well being or
hurt them mentally, when it is unnecessary and taken out of context or
misunderstood. Because I don't believe users should be treated as a product
unknowingly for others gain, whether monetary or not, for all the above
reasons. People are not property or products, and treating them as such can
stall our human evolution, which hurts our well being"
Again to claim your philosophy or point of view doesn't have to explained,
is a cop out and shameful. And shows your own lack of understanding.
