I presume that the same non-graphical back-end programs are being invoked by both AR/A and Synaptic when they call the same functions (eg install or uninstall), and that these same programs are probably being invoked by apt-get commands too. Also, the Synaptic and AR/A GUIs are mostly calling on libraries used in other graphical apps. So there's not as much duplication of effort as it might appear.
OK, so you endorse my proposed three category rating system, but propose
reducing the number of GUI interfaces to maintain. I believe that AR/A and
Synaptic should have quite different purposes. In my original proposal, AR/A
would only offer end-user applications, although I agree this would include
any user-friendly expansions available for those applications. Synaptic would
also offer packages average end users don't use, for things like development
environments, test servers etc.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose application sof... t8mf4nu6lizp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose application sof... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose application sof... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose application sof... rhutter
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose application sof... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose application sof... rhutter
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose applicatio... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose application sof... cd1207
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Helping new users choose application sof... ivaldaloucha