This isn't technically against the community guidelines, but I apologise in advance for the propaganda.
> Anarcho-capitalism is the only true form of anarchism This is an utterly baseless assertion. "Anarcho-capitalism" is in fact a recent development, and it comes from an entirely different tradition- the right-propertarian "libertarians", not the worker's movement. Even if you disagree with the anarchist opposition to capitalism, there is at least a consistent and reasoned argument as to why capitalism is a form of hierarchy which should be abolished- and it is that which you must refute, not simply trot out the old 'communism=state! Oh noes!' line. It is capitalism which requires authority to defend property and enforce wage-slavery. > as any other > form implies some kind of authority to promote social equality Social equality will stem from the organisational form of anarchist society- a federation of free associations. The 'enforcement' of social equality is only required if the underlying system actually tends towards ever-increasing inequality, such as capitalism. It is the anarchist aim to establish a society which, through the abolition of the class and wages system, will not have conflict leading to inequality. Consider Libertarian Socialist Rants' 'The Case Against Hierarchy' (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIvn8qjyrzk) and 'The Case For Liberty' (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiq-PREk2IE). They are excellent introductions to social anarchism and the anarchist conception of hierarchy. It is capitalism that requires a state to enforce social equality, because capitalism is inherently undemocratic, polarising, and leads to ever widening inequality if left unchecked. Thankfully, we have a state which prevents capitalism from running entirely out of control by guaranteeing at least some minimal rights to the working class (in first world countries, at least), and thus serves the long-term interests of capital by pacifying the populace. > and > private property distribution. I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Since when did anarchists want 'private property' distribution? Social anarchism involves the abolition of property and the retention of possession, not 'private property distribution', whatever that means. This is a typical "libertarian" distortion. If you want to learn about actual libertarianism, that is, libertarian socialism or social anarchism, then an excellent publication to read is the Anarchist FAQ. If you run Trisquel, as I assume you do, there is actually a package which provides it called anarchism. Simply apt-get install anarchism, then browse to /usr/share/doc/anarchism/html/index.html to read. You should especially have a look at the section on "anarcho-capitalism" here: /usr/share/doc/anarchism/html/secFcon.html and a more in-depth refutation of "anarcho-capitalism" in appendix F: /usr/share/doc/anarchism/html/append1.html You can also read the Anarchist FAQ online: http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/index.html Feel free to drop me an email at mox...@riseup.net if you wish to discuss this further. I will be happy to have a chat.