Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial Xerus will be launched the 21 of April.

[onpon4]

> Browsing the site, there are packages that say they are under a "BSD  
Licence" or "MIT Licence" and are listed as such, but there is no link to the  
source (on their site or Git) and the tar.gz or .zip files do not contain any  
licensing information.

I think listing a classifier that says the license is the "OSI approved" "MIT  
license" works to place the software under that license (the Expat license).  
As for a "link to the source (on their site or Git)", why is that necessary?  
Is the source distribution on PyPI not enough? It's possible (though  
unlikely) for a source code download to be unavailable, but source code  
downloads are marked as such, so you should be able to auto-detect this.