If you want a free programm, do it yourself.
Like lembas wrote, you do not have to do things yourself: freedom 3 makes the
whole user community control the software.
I'm gonna try to make you understand my point of view, supposing you are not
a fanatic nor a member of spanish mob. :)
Please, substitute my idea for Free Software in your own arguments and then
ask yourself to realise that you're wrong.
This way:
" Excellent analogy: do hieroglyphs (or their author) deny your freedoms
because you cannot read / write them by yourself? It is absurd. Defining
"freedom" as "being able to do anything by oneself" only leads to such
absurdities. Fortunately, you do not write any dictionary.
Like not being able to read / write hieroglyphs, not being able to (easily)
use a program is not a denial of your freedoms. *You* are not able. It is not
an external control/interference/regulation (such as copyright, DRMs,
non-disclosure of the source code, etc.) that prevents you from using the
program. "
Thanks.
