I think it is bad for them to host the non-free repositories. I can
understand perhaps for firmware that is barely acceptable, but I do not think
they can really say Debian is "completely free software", when they just
don't enable the bad stuff by default.
It doesn't mean we shouldn't use it. I don't have a problem just sticking to
'main' personally. But I think that it is more accurate to say the Debian
kernel is " awaiting firmwares" and free software. I am not sure about this.
I personally feel wary of the project's goals when they host the non-free
software. I hope they ditch it or at least ditch all the non-free software
other than firmware, like Fedora.
- [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in Debian. Maybe... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in Debi... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in Debi... albertoefg
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in Debi... albertoefg
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in Debi... blade . vp2020
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in ... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available... dguthrie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in ... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available... dguthrie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now avail... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in Debi... dguthrie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in Debi... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in Debi... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available in ... dguthrie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ZFS now available... tegskywalker
