[email protected] wrote:
Why does all of the documentation look so bad?
It looks like markup that isn't being processed with the appropriate markup
program, so you're seeing the markup instead of the processed output:
- links show up as URLs instead of being clickable
- headers show up as "==foo==" instead of being rendered on new lines in an
appropriately larger font
- lists show up with asterisks instead of being formatted so each item in
the list is on its own line and a proper bullet character is used.
and so on. And you're also seeing a fill justification which makes the
markup look like a wall of text instead of a series of (in my opinion,
easier to read) left-justified paragraphs.
