BTW What's the best way to give feedback directly to the Uruk developers?
I like the look and feel of Uruk 2.0-beta-2, and I look forward to the final
release, but I can't keep using it on my Aspire One. Even with the new SSD
drive, the performance is just too patchy. If I have more than one browser
tab open, I immediately start to have problems, including typing text and
nothing happens, or a random selection of the letters I typed appear. Maybe
1GB RAM is just not enough for Uruk 2.0, but ideally a distro like this would
run on any box that can run XP, which is what the Aspire One came with when I
bought it.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) noordinaryspider
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) handala
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) noordinaryspider
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) pinmaritim
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) noordinaryspider
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) strypey
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) pinmaritim
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alp... strypey
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0... pinmaritim
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux... strypey
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Uruk GNU/... pinmaritim
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) lilos1
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Alpha) greatgnu