On 27/10/17 22:12, wrote: > I think Trisquel 8.0 should be Trisquel 9.0.
I was afraid that this moment would eventually come. That the
delay of Trisquel 8 (more than one year) would grow to the point that it
would be suggested to wait for the next Ubuntu LTS release - and that it
would have a point (75% of the time has already passed, so why not to
wait for the remaining 25%?). Except that there is no reason to think
that Trisquel developers would work faster on the next Ubuntu LTS
release that they were working on the present one. So, my view on it...
it would mean more delay on exchange for nothing.
--
Ignacio Agulló · agu...@ati.es
0xC6AB2D51.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
