Yeah, free"able". Meaning able to be freed. Meaning it's not *currently* free aka it's not free or non-free.... :)

Trying to come up with positive-sounding names for software that does not provide the four freedoms in its current form seems too much like trying to "spin" non-free software into something that sounds more palatable.

While writing this I'm suddenly reminded of the term "open washing"; http://openwashing.org/

Reply via email to