Yea- I agree. I was absolutely born with certain advantages even ignoring all other more significant advantages I may have or had early on. I was born in the US. Full stop. While there are people who are disadvantaged here almost everybody has got it better off than a large percentage of people around the world who are similarly disadvantaged. The reality is even someone begging on the street here has it better than the equivalent in a great many places around the world. For at least here there are people with the resources to provide to those without (and do) that do not exist elsewhere.

If I had it my way I'd end taxation or near to it as is remotely possible and open the boarders. There is nothing wrong with healthy competition from the third world when governments don't disadvantage some for the benefit others and by that I mean what is generally sold to us as being for the benefit of one group we might think "that's good- we're helping the poor" generally means in practice the funneling of money to another private wealthy interest. Or for that matter safety. Governments frequently mandate things over "safety" in spite of the costs far outweighing the benefits but all the while they do it anyway because some private interest benefits.

Right now what happens is the good paying jobs move overseas if you limit immigration and from there you really are just infringing on one population or anothers right to travel. I also don't like the idea of boarders in that these polices are in a sense racist towards people of other regions and bigoted toward those less fortunate. Regardless of the increase in immigration the vast majority of Americans would still be in a better position to compete given the standards and investment in education and for those that don't it's probably largely ones own undoing or an otherwise failed or failing education system. Evaluate opportunities, pick paths that pay, save, and learn to adapt to change. It's going to happen regardless. You might as well prepare and if you don't you probably have had too much of advance in life relative to others around the world. And in a capitalist society your kids may not do as well as you did. That's the price of capitalism.

We're better off coming up with technical solutions to problems than implementing legal solutions as the legal ones frequently don't do much of anything other than take money from one group (taxpayers) and put it in the hands of another (lawyers/government employees of one sort or another) without actual benefit or maybe minimal benefit (ie if you fund a police force and the resulting arrests don't result in reduced crime then whats the point? I bring this up because criminals tend not to think about the consequence of the crimes they are committing so increasing police when police sort of clean up rather than stop crime and then do that really poorly you have to ask yourself if it makes any sense at all to fund a police force of any significant size- there may be a solution to reducing crime- but it probably is not in policing).

Reply via email to