All I said about Trisquel 10 is that it will be based on Ubuntu 20.04, and that's all I know about it.
As for Trisquel 9, all I know is what I've gathered from tuning into some of the Freedom Friday meetings, which is that the priority now seems to be infrastructural improvements, that this involves support for non-x86 architectures, and that Trisquel 9 will probably be the first version to support these architectures. Here are some relevant excerpts from one of the meetings. 2018-09-28 08:05:01 quidam so I worked on the build system most of yesterday 2018-09-28 08:05:30 quidam I upgraded jenkins, which was very old, and moved the process from pbuilder to sbuild 2018-09-28 08:05:44 leny2010 great 2018-09-28 08:06:05 quidam it is now faster, hopefully more reliable, and allows to build arm/powerpc and other architectures ... 2018-09-28 08:16:00 quidam we are kind of limited to what ubuntu supports 2018-09-28 08:16:24 jxself Right, and they have support for armhf, arm64, and ppc64el already. 2018-09-28 08:16:29 quidam ubuntu has armhf and arm64 2018-09-28 08:16:32 jxself ppc64el would be good for the Talos II machine. 2018-09-28 08:17:05 jxself armhf for the EOMA68 machine ... 2018-10-05 09:13:27 chaosmonk i see some talk of supporting other archs 2018-10-05 09:13:48 chaosmonk will this be for T8, or will non-x86 support start with t9? 2018-10-05 09:15:06 chaosmonk in particular, is there a possibility of trisquel supporting arm soon enough for eoma68 cards to ship with it? 2018-10-05 09:17:07 quidam it will most likely start with t9 Note that "we are kind of limited to what ubuntu supports" seems to confirm that if Ubuntu dropped 32-bit then Trisquel would too. Again though, I don't see any reason to think this will happen soon.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
