I do not understand well technical things, though, what I want to accomplish
with drawing software is that to create projective geometry-wise retouched
pictures and prove the nature of the connection between mathematics and the
skeptical abilities.
For example, there is one of my works "a note of the bundle of the laundry".
I would like to retouch this work by digital projective geometry-wise
diagrams. The source light is above the clothes in the work. Those figures
emerge into the surface of the clothes by the light. In geometry, a
hyperplane is a subspace whose dimension is one less than that of its ambient
space. In n-dimensional space, a hyperplane means a n-1 flat subspace. (Note:
I think that I understand the risk that introducing scientific rules outside
the realm of science.) The source light plays the part of the top of a cone.
My figures seem to be kind of subspaces of the cone that are lighted up by
the light. So I would prefer a vector image editor than a raster image editor
sounds reasonable in even only that sense. But this is just my guess that why
I preferred Inkscape than Gimp or Krita. Because I do not know almost at all
technical things about computers.
On the contrary I would like to ask, for my purpose, which editor is suitable
for my purpose do you think? I tried to use Gimp, I clicked an icon that
seemed to function as a pen. I moved the digitizer on the tablet to draw
something and, indeed, the pointer on the screen moved, too. But a line was
not drawn. I tried again and again and other various things to draw just one
line. But I could not make it. Does that seem to be suitable for my
intuition? I could do that on Inkscape without difficulty. Besides Inkscape
sometimes changed those figures into geometric shapes automatically. I do not
still know at all how to control the function more properly but it seems to
be suitable for my intention, I appreciate the function, as if they know what
I want to do.
As for Krita, I could not open even a new file. That is a probelm before
talking about geometry.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best environment on Trisquel f... ewindes
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best environment on Trisquel f... softwdensky
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best environment on Trisq... Caleb Herbert
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best environment on T... softwdensky
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best environment on T... xliang9550
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best environment ... Caleb Herbert
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best environm... softwdensky
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best env... mason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best... softwdensky
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best... softwdensky
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best... mason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best... softwdensky
- [Trisquel-users] Re : What the bes... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best env... xliang9550
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best... softwdensky
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What the best environment on Trisquel f... softwdensky