************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
Hi Leo, May 17/'11
Sounds good to me from my limited understanding. I guess the pragmatic approach is that the definition is correct for you or anyone else if it works for you in your sessions; does it work for you ok? Hindrance of knowingness or enforcement of un-knowingness has enforcement of knowingness at it's base, doesn't it? If you want to look at a painting, and I put a cover over the painting, am I not forcing you to know me as a being that is covering the painting from you? I'm creating an effect for you to know, am I not? Thanks, Aarre Peltomaa peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com (647) 202-7267 On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Leo Faulhaber <leo.faulha...@gmail.com>wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org > ************ > > Hello everyone > > I seem to have some difficulty with Dennis' definition of importance which > is "Enforcement of knowingness". For me importance is also "Hindrance of > knowigness" or "Enforcement of not-knowingness". > > So I made up the following definition of importance for myself which is "a > more or less strong conviction that someone or something should be or not be > something, do or not do something, have or not have something, know or not > know something, experience or not experience something". > > What do you think about this? > > Best wishes > > Leo Faulhaber > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > Trom@lists.newciv.org > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
