************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************ Hi Paul These are very good cognitions on games. Being stuck in a viewpoint is of course compulsively playing a game. Dennis presented TROM for human beings to erase their minds so he did not point out that once we stop playing games we will be in a state of just "Being" without any doing or having. I recall he suggested this is a good place to park for a while if the earth gets to radioactive to play a decent game in. Radiation will fade after a few hundred years. Colleen's example of a comb hits on this point also. We are each teeth in the comb ignoring the fact that we a all really the one being "the comb". As the teeth we can do battle with each other. Once we realize we are all the comb then the games end. It's no fun playing by yourself alone. Excellent realization that the junior universes are steps on Geoffery Phillips extended tone scale. As you work up from sex to know you rise to the top which is just "being" which Dennis labeled Nirvanah. You are making great progress.
Keep on TROMing Pete Sent from my iPad On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com> wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org > ************ > As I become more and more unchained from having to play games I have noticed > that in many instances there is a complete lack, perhaps an inability for > people to look from beyond their viewpoints. Their viewpoints become them. > To put it in another vernacular, they are not knowing willing cause over or > above their viewpoints. I wouldn't even say they are somewhere under their > viewpoints. They are literally their viewpoints. This makes it very hard > for them to change viewpoints, have other viewpoints, create new viewpoints. > A viewpoint is a viewpoint is a viewpoint. There is no reality that they are > a viewpoint production unit. This syndrome of viewpoints is also analogous > to having and being an automaticity. How many times have I stated that one > should be able to have more than one identity, have them simultaneously, > create them to infinity. Theta is only able to do this a lifetime at a > time????, in succession only????? > > So I have just run my Postulate Failure Chart on Having. It ran great. It > was the most active of anything that I have TimeBroken so far. This includes > Know and sexing. I have a lot to talk about inasmuch as Dennis had an error > in his theory where he starts off from the premise (the error) that a Thetans > main abilities are to Know/not Know and Bring into existence/take away from > existence. Dennis has mixed and matched Axioms here and has gone beyond what > a Thetan BASICALLY does which is consider and as Ron says, just maybe this is > all a Thetan does for Theta is thought and always has been, nothing else. > > As an example, Theta has to have a beingness to Know. This may not make > sense at first but if you look at Dennis' scale it goes down to sexing. One > must definitely have a beingness to play that game. If you go on up this > scale from Sexing to Know you will find that they are all from a beingness. > In fact to be playing any of the games in the Postulate Failure Chart from > Sexing to Know, one has to have a beingness as opposed to other beingnesses > as all these beingnesses including yours is in contest, playing a game. > > I can write much more about this and it would take pages and pages. The main > point I want to make is that I am now using the Postulate Failure Chart as it > would apply to one of the MAJOR cycles that a Thetan gets into. Be, Do, > Have. This starts or can start from pure Theta into pure MEST. > > I have over several weeks run the Chart with Have. At the beginning I was > having extreme! changes. I was yawning with every breath at times. Two, > three, a half dozen yawns only separated by having to take a breath. Then > running the commands again with the same phenomena. > > If anyone is interested I can email the Chart with Have to you so that you > will have a copy to print out. My next run is going to be with Do. > > By the way, Be, Do, Have is an extremely short rendition of the factors. > Just looking at Be, it is Theta deciding to Be. Hmmmmmmm. From pure and > only Theta to a beingness and the rest is history, the Time Track and the > story of the Factors. > > Perhaps by just running the Postulate Failure Chart using beingnesses is > incomplete as it does not address the cross-over from Theta into MEST. I > know, some have mentioned this area as not being smooth or whatever after > completing Level 5. > > There are also many other Theta-MEST cycles to investigate such as Create, > Survive, Destroy; Start, Change, Stop. There are also two categories, they > are as a beingness or as Theta. I now know that using Know as the top of > games is not all encompassing and there is more that needs to be done to be > sure that all games conditions as a beingness and as a Thetan are run out as > well as the games in transitioning between Theta & MEST. > > Paul, Level 5 in progress > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > Trom@lists.newciv.org > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
