************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: > From: Complete Your Bridge <i...@completeyourbridge.org> > Date: February 17, 2012 12:48:37 PM PST > To: <pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: Complete Your Bridge Contact Form > Reply-To: i...@completeyourbridge.org > > > Hi Pete, > > > thanks a lot for your feedback! > > I can see your logic (I think we discussed this before > on Ant's IVy2 list). > > However, in our processing we take the PC's items > and wordings as he works them out in session. I haven't > seen a PC yet whose mind was constructed according to > any theory textbook, so it is safest to take what the > PC comes up with. > > > > All the best, > Heidrun > > > > > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:48:04 +0000, <pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> Complete Your Bridge Contact Form >> >> >> Name: Pete McLaughlin >> Country: USA >> E-Mail: pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com >> Phone: 760 7930229 >> >> >> Message: HI >> I am happy to see that someone is processing GPM's. However, your postulate >> failure cycle is incomplete. >> The example you give of a girl wanting to have a perfect marriage then after >> many failures deciding not to have any marriage is only half the cycle. >> >> The full cycle is: >> to create a perfect marriage >> >> to not be married >> >> to get someone else to crate a perfect marriage >> >> to cause someone else to not crate a perfect marriage >> >> This is easier to understand if I use the subject "to fuck" >> >> The cycle of failure is: >> 1. must fuck >> 2. must not fuck >> 3. must be fucked >> 4. must not be fucked >> The being failing at postulate 1 will be forced to pursue postulate 2. >> Failure at 2 forces the being to assume the valence of his opponent and >> pursue that beings postulate 3. Failure at 3 forces the being to adopt >> postulate 4. Failure at 4 causes the being to assume the valence of his >> overwhelmer who was pursuing postulate 1 but since this postulate is in >> failure the being will find a new postulate having nothing to do with >> fucking to pursue. >> >> hTe opposing id's are >> 1. "to fuck" opposed by "to not be fucked" >> 2. "to not fuck" opposed by "to be fucked" >> >> On the subject of fucking then the auditor should run out all charge on each >> of the 4 id's in the 2 conflicts starting with #4 and working back to #1. >> >> if you want more information on this analytical construct for the GPM you >> can download "The Resolution of Mind" by Dennis Stephens from the site >> www.tromhelp.com. All of Dennis Stephen's materials are in the public >> domain so you are welcome to them. >> >> Sincerely, >> Pete >> >> >> >> >> > Heidrun Beer > > http://CompleteYourBridge.org
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
