*************
The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
************
I have run them all with absolutely no difficulty.
The biggest gainer was 'Have'. That is one area where there is a lot
of contest and therefore a lot of failure. Of course this is true of
Be and Do. Perhaps 'Have' took a lot off of them too.
If you will look at the Junior goals, Dennis has 'Have' there. If
you will then look at all of them either singularly or as a class,
you will see that they all are a doingness.
Now for Be. Well you have to be something in order to do the junior
goals. You can't be a nothing. Dennis even states that you should
be masculine and feminine as you run them. There is a 'be' right there.
I would say that the more general the goal being run the better. Who
knows what convoluted, silly, aberrated, twisted around the bedpost
goal someone or all of us hasn't come up with sometime over the last
several Trillion years. Ya know, language and words are by
themselves also an impediment and will always be.
Dennis was not perfect, he was not the God of every and all
processes. He did not 'Know' all. There is even question as to
whether he finished Level 5. Any and all such processes should be
questioned unless you know that they come from such authority.
Paul/Level 5 in progress
On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:06 AM, trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org wrote:
5. Be, Do, Have (Leo Faulhaber)
Paul Tipon
I would say that Be and Do are possible non-life goals. In contrast
to Have
they are both not on the list of life goals which have been tested by
Dennis. Why are they possible non-life goals? They are too general.
Be is
just holding a specific set of postulates. And those postulates can be
anything, life or non-life. And Do is just realizing any postulate,
life or
non-life. I would be careful in running those on Level 5.
Best wishes
Leo Faulhaber
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
Trom@lists.newciv.org
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
